na realidade o cara trabalha para o mercado que está investido em OURO
fisico
para ele o mercado se livrando dos papeis e fugindo para o ouro interessa a
ele (digo grupo)

mas o defiti publico americano sempre deixou os conselheiros de cabelo em
pé: como recomendar que o dinheiro dos seus clientes seja entregue de
bandeja (compra de titulos do tesouro americano)

mas é comodo para quem IMPRIME US$ ficar na contra-mão do mercado
qualquer coisa basta rodar a guitarra

dificil é um pais como nosso que vive de vender o "patrimonio" - commodities
- operar com um US$ tão barato ou em contra-partida - um real SOBRE
valorizado

esta será sem duvida a chamada "herança maldita" que nosso estadista deixara
para seu sucessor - seja quem for ou independente de partido



2009/11/24 Paulo Sérgio Pinto <ppi...@superig.com.br>

>
>
> Eu acho que os EUA, ainda que aos trancos e barrancos, se safam. O Porter
> Stansberry, autor do texto abaixo, não leu Thomas Hobbes. Ou, se leu, não
> entendeu. Um país com os melhores canhões do planeta é virtualmente
> inquebrável.  :-) :-) :-)
>
>
> AKA escreveu:
>
>    *The bankruptcy of the United States is now certain*  Tuesday, November
> 24, 2009
>
> *From Porter Stansberry in the S&A Digest:*
>
> It's one of those numbers that's so unbelievable you have to actually think
> about it for a while... Within the next 12 months, the U.S. Treasury will
> have to refinance $2 trillion in short-term debt. And that's not counting
> any additional deficit spending, which is estimated to be around $1.5
> trillion. Put the two numbers together. Then ask yourself, how in the world
> can the Treasury borrow $3.5 trillion in only one year? That's an amount
> equal to nearly 30% of our entire GDP. And we're the world's biggest
> economy. Where will the money come from?
>
> How did we end up with so much short-term debt? Like most entities that
> have far too much debt - whether subprime borrowers, GM, Fannie, or GE - the
> U.S. Treasury has tried to minimize its interest burden by borrowing for
> short durations and then "rolling over" the loans when they come due. As
> they say on Wall Street, "a rolling debt collects no moss." What they mean
> is, as long as you can extend the debt, you have no problem. Unfortunately,
> that leads folks to take on ever greater amounts of debt… at ever shorter
> durations… at ever lower interest rates. Sooner or later, the creditors wake
> up and ask themselves: What are the chances I will ever actually be repaid?
> And that's when the trouble starts. Interest rates go up dramatically.
> Funding costs soar. The party is over. Bankruptcy is next.
>
> When governments go bankrupt it's called "a default." Currency speculators
> figured out how to accurately predict when a country would default. Two
> well-known economists - Alan Greenspan and Pablo Guidotti - published the
> secret formula in a 1999 academic paper. That's why the formula is called
> the Greenspan-Guidotti rule. The rule states: To avoid a default, countries
> should maintain hard currency reserves equal to at least 100% of their
> short-term foreign debt maturities. The world's largest money management
> firm, PIMCO, explains the rule this way: "The minimum benchmark of reserves
> equal to at least 100% of short-term external debt is known as the
> Greenspan-Guidotti rule. Greenspan-Guidotti is perhaps the single concept of
> reserve adequacy that has the most adherents and empirical support."
>
> The principle behind the rule is simple. If you can't pay off all of your
> foreign debts in the next 12 months, you're a terrible credit risk.
> Speculators are going to target your bonds and your currency, making it
> impossible to refinance your debts. A default is assured.
>
> So how does America rank on the Greenspan-Guidotti scale? It's a guaranteed
> default. The U.S. holds gold, oil, and foreign currency in reserve. The U.S.
> has 8,133.5 metric tonnes of gold (it is the world's largest holder). That's
> 16,267,000 pounds. At current dollar values, it's worth around $300 billion.
> The U.S. strategic petroleum reserve shows a current total position of 725
> million barrels. At current dollar prices, that's roughly $58 billion worth
> of oil. And according to the IMF, the U.S. has $136 billion in foreign
> currency reserves. So altogether... that's around $500 billion of reserves.
> Our short-term foreign debts are far bigger.
>
> According to the U.S. Treasury, $2 trillion worth of debt will mature in
> the next 12 months. So looking only at short-term debt, we know the Treasury
> will have to finance at least $2 trillion worth of maturing debt in the next
> 12 months. That might not cause a crisis if we were still funding our
> national debt internally. But since 1985, we've been a net debtor to the
> world. Today, foreigners own 44% of all our debts, which means we owe
> foreign creditors at least $880 billion in the next 12 months - an amount
> far larger than our reserves.
>
> Keep in mind, this only covers our existing debts. The Office of Management
> and Budget is predicting a $1.5 trillion budget deficit over the next year.
> That puts our total funding requirements on the order of $3.5 trillion over
> the next 12 months.
>
> So… where will the money come from? Total domestic savings in the U.S. are
> only around $600 billion annually. Even if we all put every penny of our
> savings into U.S. Treasury debt, we're still going to come up nearly $3
> trillion short. That's an annual funding requirement equal to roughly 40% of
> GDP. Where is the money going to come from? From our foreign creditors? Not
> according to Greenspan-Guidotti. And not according to the Indian or the
> Russian central bank, which have stopped buying Treasury bills and begun to
> buy enormous amounts of gold. The Indians bought 200 metric tonnes this
> month. Sources in Russia say the central bank there will double its gold
> reserves.
>
> So where will the money come from? The printing press. The Federal Reserve
> has already monetized nearly $2 trillion worth of Treasury debt and mortgage
> debt. This weakens the value of the dollar and devalues our existing
> Treasury bonds. Sooner or later, our creditors will face a stark choice:
> Hold our bonds and continue to see the value diminish slowly, or try to
> escape to gold and see the value of their U.S. bonds plummet.
>
> One thing they're not going to do is buy more of our debt. Which central
> banks will abandon the dollar next? Brazil, Korea, and Chile. These are the
> three largest central banks that own the least amount of gold. None own even
> 1% of their total reserves in gold.
>
> I examined these issues in much greater detail in the most recent issue of
> my newsletter, Porter Stansberry's Investment Advisory, which we published
> last Friday. Coincidentally, the New York Times repeated our warnings -
> nearly word for word - in its paper today. (They didn't mention
> Greenspan-Guidotti, however... It's a real secret of international
> speculators.)
>
> *Crux Note:* The S&A Digest comes free with a subscription to Porter
> Stansberry's Investment Advisory. Porter says his latest issue is the most
> important he's ever written. If you don't act right now to protect yourself
> from the dollar, he thinks the odds are very high you'll be wiped out over
> the next 12 months. To learn more, click 
> here<http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/0811PSINEX99/EPSIKB52/PR>
> .
>
> *More from Porter Stansberry:
> *
> What the world's best investors are recommending 
> now<http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/3184/Porter_Stansberry>
>
> Stansberry: Detroit's socialist nightmare is America's 
> future<http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/3247/Government_Stupidity>
>
> Porter Stansberry produces best government rant you'll read in 
> 2009<http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/3447/Government_Stupidity>
>
>
>  
>



-- 
aka
(21) 8256-0865
http://www.redeamazoniaazul.net.br/

LIFE WAS BORN AT SEA,
DON’T LET IT DIE THERE!

Responder a