In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to me that both ton's solution and his alternative solution are
> incorrect:
> What gives?
>
probably means it's wrong, though i thought what I did was actually portable.
What is your perl version ? What is your CPU type ?
What do these print for you:perl -wle 'print 1<<64' perl -wle 'print+(0..3)[2**32]' perl -wle 'print+(0..3)[2**31]'
