OK thanks,
To be honest - looking at other thread - I think Google is not always
that fast in responding.
But maybe this time we get a response.
I must admit that I'm a little bit spoiled by Grails user list.... in
which we get almost instant answers ;-)
On Dec 22, 2:01 pm, Nacho Coloma <icol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> The proposed solution will only substitute the EL engine, which would
> allow you to use a broader set of ${...} expressions. AFAIK, it would
> not affect to the interpretation of web.xml.
>
> I am also waiting for some attention from Google about this bug.
>
> On Dec 22, 12:31 pm, Marcel Overdijk <marceloverd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Does the proposed solution works? Do el-ignored and include-prelude
> > work then?
>
> > I'm feeling a little bit uneased about doing this. I'm afraid I will
> > be running in different unexpected errors.
>
> > I'm also wondering what Google's statement on this would be?
>
> > Cheers,
> > Marcel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
