Nope, but it uses many of the same technologies. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:41 AM, tempy <fay...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could it be that the load created by g+ is responsible for the recent > chaos and lack of reliability? > > On Jul 19, 7:47 am, Didier Durand <durand.did...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > J. Smarr, tech lead for G+, says: "Our backends are built mostly on > > top of BigTable and Colossus/GFS" in this short description of Google+ > > insfrastructure: > http://www.quora.com/Can-someone-provide-some-information-about-Googl.... > > > > regards > > > > didier > > > > On Jul 19, 6:57 am, "J.Ganesan" <j.gane...@datastoregwt.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am curious to know the persistence engine used by Google +. Is it > > > not Google App Engine ? > > > > > J.Ganesan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to > google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
