On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:11:40 AM UTC+1, datanucleus wrote: > > Not sure also why people always want to make things into a "mines > better than yours contest". > I've got the same impression.
> DataNucleus (and Googles plugin does that, with the emphasis on being > owned by Google, and not being part of the DataNucleus project), > A big *+* for me in my decision! I'll use DN because I'm familiar with JPA2 and Java's persistence framework. I've considered the usage of Objectify about two years ago (before I've paused my project). At that time GWT used DTOs to persist data and Objectify was a viable solution to omit those ugly things. Today, with GWT's RF this advantage vanished. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/08torYEJT5IJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
