On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:51 PM, John LaBanca <jlaba...@google.com> wrote:
> I vote for @WithBindingProperties for the annotation name. Is that a vote that we should start using the term "binding properties" in general? I think that's not quite the right term (perhaps this should be a separate thread) because increasingly, those properties will affect things like compiler optimization behavior, code splitting, etc. That is, they don't only affect how GWT.create() calls get bound. How about the term "client property"? It is a property that affects what the client receives and is in every case somehow a function of the client that is requesting the script. -- Bruce --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
