Hi All, 

you don't have to move GWT RPC to REST and JSON when you want to move the 
backend to Spring Boot. GWT RPC is just a servlet which you can register in 
Spring Boot.

Here are some examples of the standard GWT Demo StockWatcher but 
implemented using Spring Boot with GWT RPC and REST JSON:

https://github.com/lofidewanto/stockwatcher

(1) This example shows how to integrate the GWT RPC servlet to Spring Boot 
using 
@WebServlet: 
https://github.com/lofidewanto/stockwatcher/blob/master/stockwatcher-springboot-webapp/stockwatcher-springboot-webapp-server/src/main/java/stockwatcher/GreetingServiceImpl.java

(2) This example shows to integrate the GWT RPC servlet to Spring Boot, but 
I think doesn't work so far. I could take a look if you want to.

https://github.com/lofidewanto/stockwatcher/blob/master/stockwatcher-springboot/stockwatcher-springboot-server/src/main/java/stockwatcher/WebConfig.java

Cheers,
Lofi

Michael Joyner schrieb am Montag, 21. November 2022 um 16:50:29 UTC+1:

> *Are you using gwt-RPC ?*
> Yes! we are using GWT-RPC & currently having a single WAR of near about 
> 500mb, having CLIENT-SHARED-SERVER in a same project.
>
> You can still have everything in a master parent project that builds the 
> final WAR with all the client JS and SERVER classes in the same war.
>
>
> *You'll need to switch to JSON for data transport.*
> Is there any drawback of switching to JSON in GWT, such as impact on 
> performance etc.
>
> You lose easy polymorphism for models, they will require an extra set of 
> annotations at the very least if you have polymorphism as part of your DTO 
> setup.
>
>
> *You'll need to use something like DominoKit REST.*
> We found one RestyGWT <https://resty-gwt.github.io/>, but not sure about 
> its final impact as we haven't applied it yet. any suggestions...
>
> RestyGWT is effectively defunct. Stick with a modern GWT3 compatible 
> approach such as DominoKit.
>
>
>
> *It would be also be best to split the project into three projects. An API 
> project, a shared code project, and a UI project.*
> We cannot get why keeping *SHARED CODE *as a separate project is best. We 
> are not having any library of GWT on server side. So except MODELS, what 
> are the other stuffs we can have in SHARED CODE PROJECT.   
>
> In this case SHARED CODE is really just the MODELS and INTERFACES and 
> possible the REST Interface.
>
>
> *If you are using gwt-RPC then IMHO there will need to be a big 
> refactoring change at the very least*
> This is where we are stuck & looking for the solution with a minimum 
> change and should be stable but unable to figure out yet. 
>
> I don't think you can accomplish this with a large project with minimum of 
> change unless the client API calls are fully abstracted away (or can be) so 
> that code could be replaced with a different class.
>
>
> On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 7:37:33 PM UTC+5:30 Michael Joyner wrote:
>
>> There are a lot of factors to consider.
>>
>> Are you using gwt-RPC ? You'll need to switch to JSON for data transport.
>>
>> You'll need to use something like DominoKit REST (
>> https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-rest)  for the data transport layer.
>>
>> It would be also be best to split the project into three projects. An API 
>> project, a shared code project, and a UI project.
>>
>> If you are using gwt-RPC then IMHO there will need to be a big 
>> refactoring change at the very least.
>>
>>
>> On 11/21/22 08:19, viny...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> We are having a huge project already running successfully on GWT. 
>>
>> But for some reasons we are planning to move our backend to SPRING-BOOT 
>> keeping front end in GWT. 
>>
>> Is there any way we can do it easily without a big change in our existing 
>> application. 
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c267bbb3-504f-41a8-896a-a2c2463eccdcn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c267bbb3-504f-41a8-896a-a2c2463eccdcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/1790c907-ce31-4d97-a5b9-1915fef68865n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/1790c907-ce31-4d97-a5b9-1915fef68865n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c72c9f90-745f-44ea-9e00-48ee42ae5576n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to