Okay, found the bug. On June 10th I made a change to deal with archives containing more than one million messages. A piece of code had decided that one million was a really big number and was starting to write scientific notation to some internal log files. Unfortunately my change was flawed and I've disrupted both the Archived-At database and sitemap entries for the last 20 days or so. I have hopefully corrected the code, so there should be good data going forward.
Can you remind me which lists are actively using the Archived-At feature? -Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
