Daniel Calvelo wrote: > > Replying to myself twice, sorry. > > After reading v.univar/main.c more thoroughly, I think I'm > understanding the issue: v.univar.sh is *not* a shell equivalent of > v.univar. Actually, v.univar.sh should have been called v.db.univar. > > [...] > > -- > -- Daniel Calvelo Aros >
While working on the book, I came across this issue again. I have added it now as scripts/v.db.univar in CVS. Markus -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/d.vect.thematic%3A-v.univar.sh--%3E-v.univar--tf3675636.html#a11270068 Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@grass.itc.it http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
