Given the introduction to the Antiphonale Monasticum available at the first posted URL, I (given my position earlier in this thread) would definitely encode this as "o" since the book is making no specific distinction.
Regards, Henry On Wednesday, 06 August 2014 at 11:13:24 pm +0200, Olivier Berten wrote: > Some presentations of the oriscus: > > http://download.gna.org/gregorio/pdf/Antiphonaire_Solesmes_%281931%29.pdf#page=6 > http://download.gna.org/gregorio/pdf/Antiphonaire_Milan_%281935%29.pdf#page=8 > > 2014-08-06 22:22 GMT+02:00 Olivier Berten <olivier.ber...@gmail.com>: > > Hi! > > > > I just noticed while checking some files on GregoBase that Solesmes' > > oriscus looks much more like Gregorio's oriscus auctus... should we > > encode them as oriscus or oriscus auctus? or should we change the > > shape of the oriscus in Gregorio? > > > > http://gregobase.selapa.net/chant.php?id=4232 > > http://gregobase.selapa.net/chant.php?id=4259 > > http://gregobase.selapa.net/chant.php?id=4605 > > > > Olivier > > _______________________________________________ > Gregorio-users mailing list > Gregorio-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users > _______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list Gregorio-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
