On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 19:02 +0100, Tim Janik wrote: > in fact, there is no technical reason for this. so many people have > argued this to be better though (havoc even went so far as to argue > why this would be conceptually neccessary), that i decided to simply > sponsor an object type if that helps the majority to understand which > objects are floating and which are not.
Not that it's all that relevant ;-) but I also thought a flag in the class would be fine (and I thought a separate class would be fine too), just seems to me it should be somehow marked. James made a good point that right now it's already poorly marked, but why make it worse... Havoc _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
