On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 15:40 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote: > > So trying doesn't mean that we'd have to ship a broken GTK+. But GNOME > > would decide quite soon whether they think GTK+ is likely to manage it, > > and I don't think you need to worry about them being too optimistic. > If you agree to ship what is ready if it's ready, then why not just rely > on the GTK+ 2.10 API and maybe release with GTK+ 2.12 (even if not using > the new API)?
That's effectively what would happen if GNOME said that they don't expect GTK+ 2.12 to be ready and then it suddenly was ready. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
