On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 12:52 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > Something like: > - get a few reviews and comments on candidate codebases > - iterate codebases accordingly > - try to get a couple real-world apps to try them out > - iterate accordingly > - get review and feedback from gtk maintainers > - iterate accordingly > - submit resulting mature and well-reviewed codebase to gtk bugzilla > > If that makes sense, I'd suggest that others review and write up their > thinking on GooCanvas, perhaps reading some of the old threads, Piccolo, > HippoCanvas, etc. as background material. And also if there are other > canvas maintainers who want to put their hat in the ring, they should > probably speak up.
I've already spent a lot of time on GooCanvas though, so I don't really want to spend a lot more time implementing features the GTK+ maintainers want, and then have them choose another canvas instead. I'd rather they chose one canvas and said "do A, B & C and it goes in". Damon _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list