2007/6/13, Yevgen Muntyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > 2007/6/13, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> GtkBuilder is just setting the name that was specified in the xml, so > >> it is not violating the principle that the widget name belongs to the > >> app/user, since > >> the xml is part of the app. > >> > > And widget isn't part of the app? Such separation is meaningless for > purpose of answering the question "should we change code of given > widget if we want the widget to be usable with GtkBuider?" > > So, if a widget sets its name to modify its style, then > it's broken? Even if the style is essential part of its functionality? > E.g. text cursor color is not something fancy, it's an essential part > of text widget and it rather sucks if cursor is invisible because of > wrong styles. Saying "it's broken because it is somehow > not a part of application" just doesn't make sense.
So let's see, the things that make up a "style" in gtkrc are colors and style properties. Any special-casing above (or rather below) that is up to the theme engine and thus can't really be trusted. Colors are grouped by functionality into fg, bg, base and text (as well as the various computed colors from those). Those have clear meanings, and should provide enough distinct colors for most widgets. If not, you must rely on custom style properties and accept that it might not match the theme. There is no way around this (other than calculating the color, but that might be less than pleasing visually). If a widget goes bonkers because a style property had the default value, maybe the default value should be made more sensible? > > Furthermore, if my (admittedly quick) glance over how the object names > > are handled is not misguided, GtkBuilder sets the name once and never > > checks it again. It has an internal hash table in which it stores the > > id in the xml and all lookups use that instead of referring to the > > actual name. > > > > So even if GtkBuilder sets the initial name to what is in the xml, you > > should be able to change it afterwards to whatever you like without > > everything going bork bork. > > > > I said already what could be a problem. get_widget_by_name() > is irrelevant. You said that matching the widgets in gtkrc would be a problem and in the part that you didn't include here I told you it's not: "A quick test shows that I can indeed match my widget by the fancy name I gave it in the code in a gtkrc, while the lookup returns the correct object with the xml id." Did I miss something obvious here? Or did you? -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
