On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Johan Dahlin wrote: > Tim Janik wrote:
>> there could conceivably be new flags in the future. also, >> "object" is different from "swapped". the former should use >> g_signal_connect_object which needs a GObject argument and >> auto-disconnects the signal handler if the object argument >> is disposed. the later also works for void* pointers. > > Oh, I knew I missed something. > > Let's use this xml attributes for the signal tag; > > name: signal name > handler: handler to connect the signal to > after: optional, boolean if True, set flags to G_CONNECT_AFTER > swapped: optional, boolean if True, set flags to G_CONNECT_SWAPPED > object: optional, if set use g_signal_connect_object > > user_type and user_data which I proposed doesn't make too much sense, it's > also difficult to support since you can't (AFAICT) use a GValue as user data. > > g_signal_connect_object does not provide a way to send in user data so it > conflicts with the user data which may be passed in to > gtk_builder_connect_signals. well, to be more precise, g_signal_connect_object hardcodes the assumption that user_data is_a GObject*. > Not a too big deal I guess, it just needs to be > documented. > > Johan > --- ciaoTJ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
