On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Christian Dywan <christ...@imendio.com> wrote: > Am Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:25:54 +0100 > schrieb Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeeti...@gmx.de>: > >> Tristan Van Berkom wrote: >> > Sorry I missed the last meeting, is there anything you need me >> > to do for GtkActivatables ? >> >> Maybe <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570797>, >> "gtk_activatable_reset has a very generic name"? > > I second that, we mustn't miss that before the stable release. > > And I share the concern that _reset should be _reset_action, not only > for the sake of object oriented languages but for clarity as well.
But it is not resetting the action. That would just be a misnomer. If you want a clearer name, it would be something like gtk_activatable_sync_appearance_properties _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
