2009/8/26 John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us>: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > >> 2009/8/26 John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us>: >>> >>> Thank you both for hashing this out for me. I'll persevere with getting >>> Webkit-Gtk to build with quartz, then. I'm not sure I agree that it's >>> "not >>> that big": WebKit.framework clocks in at 78M. >> >> Whatever the WebKit.framework is, with that size it's bound to include >> something in addition to the WebKit library. The shared library is >> just 15MB on Linux. >> >> I don't think we are still missing *that* much API after all :) > > Well, first off, Webkit drags in a bunch of dependencies (libsoup comes > immediately to mind, but there are others) which aren't necessarily required > by other parts of the application being bundled.
That's true of course. > Another major contribution is that MacOSX application binaries are roughly > twice as big as Linux binaries because they must support two architectures > (intel and power-pc) . Right, I forgot about that insanity... > Webkit is 4x, because it supports 32-bit and 64-bit > for each. ...and didn't even know about this one. :) I guess the life of a bundler is never easy. -- Kalle Vahlman, z...@iki.fi Powered by http://movial.com Interesting stuff at http://sandbox.movial.com See also http://syslog.movial.fi _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list