On Jun 25, 2010, at 7:48 AM, Havoc Pennington wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stuart Axon <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was reading about XCB and trawled through the gtk list archives noticed >> there was some discussion, but that deprecating gtkx.h seemed to stall >> things. >> Maybe now that gtk3 is coming up it would be the time to consider deprecating >> this, so that in future it could move to XCB? >> > > You can't really just deprecate it without a replacement, since there > are plenty of legitimate reasons to get at the underlying X stuff. > > I guess maybe gdkx.h could avoid including the actual xlib or xcb > headers, and instead use its own XID typedefs, and have some kind of > API to abstract Display* vs. xcb_connection_t* etc. But that's the > real hard part I would think.
Here we go again. Is Gtk+ a cross-platform toolkit or is it a wrapper for X11? Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
