On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > We could just unref the underlying object, but once the wrapping C++ > object has been destroyed, the vfuncs (and default signal handlers) will > fall back to default C implementations, if any, and this could even > cause different UI behaviour. > > If I must, then I'll force Gtk::CellRenderer and Gtk::TreeViewColumn to > be used only via RefPtr<>, like other reference-counted objects, but > this will probably just annoy C++ programmers. They feel like widgets, > so it seems odd for them to not have similar memory management.
g_object_run_dispose() is very similar to gtk_widget_destroy() in terms of memory management semantics. The main difference is that there's no ::destroy signal emitted. - Owen _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list