On So, 2011-09-04 at 04:32 -0700, Ian Martin wrote: > The return value is a pointer to the object itself. In C I believe > this helps chain the function; I'm struggling to see why I'd bother in > C++. So can I change it to return void (or mabe bool?) or is that > messing with the library too much?
Why wouldn't it be nice to have the possibility of saying animator.set_key().set_key().set_key()... ? Looks quite C++. _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
