Am 30.08.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Murray Cumming: > On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 17:53 +0200, Jonas Platte wrote: >> Most destructors are noexcept(true) by default in C++11 already [1]. >> If some class in *mm has a destructor that can throw exceptions, it's >> likely to be broken already. >> >> [1]: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/destructor > > Thanks. > > Do you think we should generally be using noexcept(true) rather than > noexcept?
I don't really know. I think cppreference just has it everywhere to distinguish between the specifier in general and its possible "values". Doesn't make a difference, so I use the shorter variant in my own code. _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
