Here's the appropriate bits from Hodges, Laura F. "Chaucer and Costume: The Secular Pilgrims in the General Prologue." (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2000) pp. 163 - 172.

Echoes what has already been said here, but I thought it was interesting nonetheless! BTW, here's the usual picture:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/chaucer/zatta/wife.jpg

Excerpts, without footnotes:

"Alisoun's Sunday garb includes three items of expensive dress commonplace in estates satires: a headdress notable enough to swear by, fine red hosiery, and new shoes. Those members of parliament who wished, through sumptuary laws, to regulate dress according to income and birth would probably agree that the Wife's cumulative inheritances and her cloth-making success entitled her to dress in this manner...However, the satirists and moralists would not have been so generous... "The moralists were most concerned with what they deemed excess in dress as it demonstrated the sin of pride..."

Hodges then goes on to give examples of how Chaucer and others often used an ornate headdress to signify pride, vanity, temptation/unchaste behavior, and/or an attempt to challenge their husbands as heads of households, but continues...

"However, the study of the history of costume and textiles throws additional light on the coverchiefs suggested in Chaucer's description. In the past, critics have debated the nature of these coverchiefs and the issue of how fashionable they may have been. To clarify these separate issues, several things must be considered. 'Hir coverchiefs ful fyne weren of ground' (I, line 453) which Riverside glosses 'fine in texture', indicates quality. However, the first MED definition for ground in this context is 'the background for ornamentation of fabric', and both the MED and OED cite Chaucer's usage in this line as the first literary example. Further, this definition facilitates a better understanding of Chaucer's attribution of heavy weight to this headdress. Granted that a fine fabric was used, what kind of decorated coverchiefs might make a weight of ten pounds? Stella Mary Newton and Mary M. Giza provide an answer to this question. They describe a veil headdress that began to appear in illuminations and sculpture by the 1360s, one which they characterize as 'veils edged with a forest of frills in airy layers almost impossible to count' and very difficult for sculptors to portray except in a stylized manner... [list some examples and provides drawing of the headdress that should be familiar to most h-costumers!]...The multiple frills at the veil's edge are achieved through a weaving process, by adding considerably to the threads at the selvedge edge, thus producing the fluted or goffered appearance, and additional weight."

"The air flow from the forward movement of dame Alisoun, striding toward the alter rail, would have lifted and fluffed the frills of such coverchiefs and added to the appearance of fullness and weight...Nevertheless even the most beruffled coverchiefs would be unlikely to weight ten ounds...and we should read the narrator's oath...as comic hyperbole directed at a fanciful headdress."

"As funeral brasses from the 1360s onward make clear, elegant coverchiefs so beruffled that they give the impression of heacy weight were in style in the late 1380s. They were neither a new style nor a fading style at that time, and Chaucer's description suggests that the Wife wears such a headdress, one that demonstrates her knowledge of fine quality in fabric and familiarity with special weaving techniques. In her portrait her coverchiefs serve as her hallmark; they adorn at the same time that they advertise, both for business and pleasure, especially so since, for dame Alisoun, the two are so frequently indistinguishable."

Hodges goes on to suggest that an additional association between coverchief and the word coverture. "Legally, coverture is 'the condition or position of a woman during her married life, when she is by law under the authority and protection of her husbane' (OED), a definition that the Wife's description of her five marriages makes highly ironic and that invests any coverchiefs, symbol of marital subjection, with the same irony."

"The Wife's coverchiefs, then, are a highly charged costume sign: they are literally a gesture of submission to her married and legal status, as depited in Chaucer's designation 'good WF' (line 445) and to St. Paul's dictum that womne's heads should be covered in church; economically the proclamation of a cloth-maker's community status and wealth; aesthetically the beautiful veiling of an attractive, seductive woman, and morally the announcement of a woman's pride, materialism, and by extension her unchastity, her sexual manipulation confessed so blatently in her Prologue."


- Hope

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to