> Hi, Hola k0ga,
> > st would always move back 1 column, > > even with wide glyhps (using more than a single column). > > > > The glyph rune is set on its first column, > > and the other ones are to 0, > > so loop until we detect the start of the previous glyph. > > Should this be done in every cursor addressing command? > What happens if we position the cursor in the middle of a glyph? That's a preliminary patch to encourage improving the matter, I suspect there might be some unhandled side-effects in some perticular cases, when using arbitrary cursor movement for example, though it's unclear if those should be handled separately or not. Would you have a suggestion about how to handle cursor absolute position with text position, maybe we need some addition state?
