On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 01:16:36PM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 11:57:38PM +0100, Elie Le Vaillant wrote: > > @@ -399,10 +400,17 @@ sanitize(struct header *h) > > for (i = 0; i < LEN(fields); i++) > > - for (j = 0; j < fields[i].l; j++) > > + for (leading = 1, j = 0; j < fields[i].l; j++) > > if (fields[i].f[j] == ' ') > > - fields[i].f[j] = '\0'; > > + fields[i].f[j] = leading ? '0' : '\0'; > > + else > > + leading = 0; > > } > > What do you think if we move this loop into a function and we use > it in both cases?
Ok, I saw that there is a new version of the patch. I am going to apply v3 without changes. sorry for the noise. Roberto Vargas
