Hello again.

It may look as if I'm talking with myself here, but the truth is that I got several replies in private, again. This time the word was that NdisWrapper should be the last resource. So now I get it: I didn't ask a stupid question. I wanted to discuss shrimp salad recipes in a synagogue. Many of you make them at home, but nobody wants to admit that openly. ;)


So let's clam down about this, OK? NdisWrapper isn't against open source drivers, since it's a hack solution which can never install automatically: It requires finding the Windows files by hand. So for a distribution, only native drivers are to choose. But as an ad-hoc solution, it's fantastic. For those who want their computers working, that is.


Anyhow, thanks to those who tried to help. As I implied earlier, I don't really know why I began messing with wireless, since I don't have any use of it right now. The interesting issue for me was that a catch-all solution exists, even if it pollutes the kernel with yuck-yuck proprietary code.


So, to wrap this little saga up, I detail my own experience. Short version: It was easy.


---------------------------


First, I tried "yum install ndiswrapper". Was that optimistic, or what? Not in Red Hat's repositories, it wasn't.


So I downloaded a tarball from http://sourceforge.net/projects/ndiswrapper/ (that's the way I really like it).


And I ran "yum install kernel-devel-2.6.25-14.fc9.i686" (just "kernel-devel" would be enough for those who are ready to upgrade their kernel at the same time). Would you believe that I ran a computer without its kernel sources on it?


And then simply "make" from the project's home directory. And "make install" as root. No, there was no autoconfigure.


And then


ndiswrapper -i Rt2500.inf


And the driver was installed:


[r...@rouge ~]# ndiswrapper -l
rt2500 : driver installed
   device (1814:0201) present (alternate driver: rt2500pci)


Are these guys nice or what? They actually tell me that I shouldn't need to work with their utility (assuming that the real driver is OK, which it isn't).


I should mention, that the card is a RaLink RT2500, which has drivers with several branches. (one of which was loaded automatically from the very beginning). There's also an official driver from Edimax. So odds are, that I would get the thing working if I cared to try which one works. But really, that wasn't the point.


Thank you all, again.

   Eli


Eli Billauer wrote:

Hello again,

For the first time ever, I got several replies in private, and only one on-list. I think that means "you asked a stupid question, but I wouldn't like to embarrass you in front of everyone".

So thanks to those who replied.

And I suppose I'll read the HOWTO and get the thingy working. Unless someone else thinks this is an interesting topic.

   Eli


--
Web: http://www.billauer.co.il

_______________________________________________
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux

Reply via email to