On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 07:32:29PM +0300, Eli Billauer wrote: > It's not like I expect Firefox to address 1 GB of RAM.
There's no 1GB of RAM limitation with 32 bit. Perhaps you meant 4GB of RAM? > So it really makes me wonder: Why are the preinstalled binaries on a > 64 bit machine, well, 64 bit executables? I run a 64 bit machine > because I want the *overall* RAM to exceed 4 GB, but except for > virtual machines, I don't expect any application to have problems > with the 32 bit limitation. I speculate that the best reason, from the distribution's point of view, is that it is simpler to only maintain and support one environment (64 bit) rather than maintain and support co-existing 32 bit and 64 bit environments. Distributions will grudgingly carry both 32 bit and 64 bit versions of an application where there 64 bit version is deficient in some sense (e.g., firefox with flash) but would naturally like to minimize these hassles. Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda | http://www.mulix.org _______________________________________________ Haifux mailing list Haifux@haifux.org http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux
