I have a vague memory that "It should be ok to return" meant something
related to the way our event dispatch worked, but I cannot recall any
details. Ergo, useless comment.
Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <zait...@redhat.com>
---
server/storage.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
commit 8c4bed7bd56a5bb2c3a654a494a6bb545f0d7db2
Author: Pete Zaitcev <zait...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu Nov 11 15:46:59 2010 -0700
Update comments.
diff --git a/server/storage.c b/server/storage.c
index c472961..5c6e3a7 100644
--- a/server/storage.c
+++ b/server/storage.c
@@ -161,9 +161,6 @@ int stor_put_start(struct open_chunk *cep, void
(*cb)(struct open_chunk *),
return 0;
}
-/*
- * It should be ok to return
- */
int stor_open_read(struct open_chunk *cep, void (*cb)(struct open_chunk *),
uint64_t key, uint64_t *psize)
{
@@ -379,6 +376,9 @@ int stor_obj_del(struct storage_node *stn, uint64_t key)
return rc;
}
+/*
+ * XXX WTF?! This accidentially tests a node instead of object! FIXME
+ */
bool stor_obj_test(struct open_chunk *cep, uint64_t key)
{
struct st_keylist *klist;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe hail-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
