Hi Willy, On Saturday 10 July 2010, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Actually, I am not that much interested in the patch per-se, I would just > > like to check the body of the check-response and compare it to a string > > for more reliable checks. > > It's what the patch does.
Hmmm, I thought it was bigger... > > I have included my original mail (and reasoning) on the > > subject below. It's not on top of my priority list right now either, > > still... sooner or later we might get bitten by it. > > > > I'd love to help out coding, but sockets and C++ are not my strong points > > (though I am comfortable in C). > > So you're welcome, haproxy is plain C, and I don't understand C++ either > ;-) How did I miss that? :-D Ok, I'll take a look at it then. Thanks for updating the patch and for pointers on where to look for problematic sections. I can't promise it will be soon though, we have a lot of work right now... but I'll do my best. Thanks, Anze
