On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > But I've just found interesting thing looing and dbf1.c code. > Why we have disabled many of DBF filed types by encapsulating some > code inside HB_COMPAT_FOXPRO? > Do we want to disable all Harbour DBF extensions when VFP begins to > use them? ;-) > I can understand that some of unfinished code should be disabled > but someone who made this modifications seriously broke existing > functionality and Harbour extensions. I'll recheck this modification > but in the future please consult such things with me.
Ups. I'm really sorry. By mistake I open xHarbour directory instead of Harbour. In Harbour we do not have any HB_COMPAT_FOXPRO (which is disabled by default) in dbf1.c so it's OK. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
