Ownership of postings, like an open source applicaion itself
automatically belongs to the author(s) - UNLESS the terms of usage on
the Wiki state that all postings become property of the Wiki maintainer.
Perhaps a terms of use statement should be created for that Wiki.
The open source license used to disemminate the posting doesn't actually
affect ownership - it signifies that the owner has guaranteed the
posting can be distributed without compensating him/her.
The concepts of ownership and distribution licenses are oft confused :-)
And I wouldn't rely on Google or anyone else keeping a permanent archive
either....
Richard Schilling
Bhaskar, KS wrote:
No, it doesn't. But I was only speaking to the concern voiced in your
post that I replied to.
-- Bhaskar
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:07 -0600, Dan wrote:
That really doesn't resolve the ownership issue though, does it?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
