Could someone please look at the discussion and the data of the Emacs bug#34035 (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34035) and tell whether the fonts that produce incorrect display are faulty, and if so, what is the problem with those fonts? Also, is there perhaps some way around these problems that would yield better results even with the fonts which currently display the kasrah below the base letter? Because I tried many different fonts with reasonable coverage of Arabic, and the vast majority of them produce this problem, so it seems like the fonts which don't are quite rare.
(As you see from the last messages, hb-view produces the same display as Emacs with HarfBuzz, so at least we are doing no worse in these cases, and we have reason to believe this is not an Emacs-specific problem.) TIA _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
