>>>>> "Jakob" == Jakob Praher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2. Performance. The result has to be reasonable competitive >> performance wise. E.g., starting eclipse has to be reasonable both in >> time and space. Jakob> How are doing with gcj in this direction? I'm not sure I understand. We do ok right now -- not great, but competitive. We're starting to look at performance a bit more now than we did in the past. Jakob> IMHO harmony should be ably to understand the Jakob> gcj abi and the so cache, which is right now at the very heart of gcj. This is hard for the reasons outlined before. Tom
