On 6/30/05, Neil Macneale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One of the reasons I am in favor of implementing as much of the JVM in > Java is that I think it is easier to write secure code in Java than in > C/C++.
I agree with this observation. I was at Java One this week. Two days ago during a Q and A session with Sun's Mustang engineering team, the question was asked if they implemented Mustang in Java. The answer was something like, "Sunlabs is doing research in building a JVM in java. When they get it correct, Mustang will incorporate it. Mustang currently has a lot of C/C++ code." I also see merit in this observation. Weldon
