My proposal is purely for the performance critical operation of marking
the classes that have live objects - as far as I'm aware, 90% of
Etienne's design still stands.
cheers
Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
Yes, I think the discussion on class unloading is one the successful
examples of open community in coming up with a good design and making
design decision. Although the final design can be one person's
proposal, but it's based on or enlightened by all the participants'
opinions. Eitenne's proposal is a big stride over the original one.
Cheers,
xiaofeng
On 11/8/06, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's worth a lot, since you have implemented this in SableVM yourself.
Thanks.
On 11/7/06, Etienne Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I'll add my humble +1.
>
> Etienne
>
> Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
> > Agreed, so plus me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > xiaofeng
> >
> > On 11/8/06, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/7/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > All,
> >> >
> >> > It looks like the debate on class unloading has concluded.
> >> >
> >> > Let's vote on implementing Robin's proposal.
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Weldon
> >> >
> >> > PS -- When class unloading gets implemented and committed is a
> seperate
> >> > issue.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > +1 I think it's the best proposal among those that were discuussed
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
> SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
> SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
>
>
>
--
Robin Garner
Dept. of Computer Science
Australian National University
