-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 20 February 2002 08:46, Bernard James POPE wrote: > > There are numerous ways to provide security for your data types.
(In)Visibility isn't security. I have more than often witnessed Java users who thought "private" keyword was for security. I think it's obvious, with many years of worldwide experience of Internet security, why obscurity is *not* security. Thanks, - -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8dCTGfAeuFodNU5wRAjGsAJ4tq8Nqg5Vh4pANHbMZ0JT+u1iVpgCcDY7i PI0TC9Y+DnVAV8AstF2ovmk= =+xqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
