I'd rather not do that, but even if I did, the type-variable action
would not be reachable in the terminal function. I could specify a
functional dependency st -> action (though I've never used it, it would
be a fun to learn). I'm curious as to why my class declaration
compiles in GHC, as there doesn't seem to be any way to use it.
-Arjun
On Aug 7, 2004, at 01:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Arjun.
How about inserting one more parameter, "action", in your class
definition:
class (Ord st) => MinimaxState st action where
successors:: st -> [(action,st)]
terminal:: st -> Bool
instance MinimaxState Int Int where
terminal i = i == 0
successors i = [(1,i+1), (-1,i-1)]
Then don't forget to start the compiler/interpreter with
-fglasgow-exts.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Carlos
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe