On 08/10/2004, at 2:57 PM, karczma wrote:
But the language encourages to use them much more often than in Haskell. They can be declared in types, there is a short syntax for "strict let", and various builtin types have strict variants. These are properties of the language.
Marcin, are you playing 'kogut', or you want to prove something, and if yes, than what?
I believe that Marcin wishes to prove the same point that I want to: namely, Clean encourages use of strictness by making it easier to use (via language annotations). At the risk of sounding ignorant and arrogant, I think the Haskell community in general does not understand the importance of syntactic sugar to make such tasks easier.
-- % Andre Pang : trust.in.love.to.save
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
