Timely question. :-)
GHC supports lexically scoped type variables. And this support has just been _extended_ to be readily useful for you (see discussion on the ghc list just a few days back). With GHC CVS HEAD the following program works fine. (Note that I removed the inner Num constraint.)
{-# OPTIONS -fglasgow-exts #-}add :: Num a => a -> a -> a
add n1 n2 = addToN1 n2
where addToN1 :: a -> a
addToN1 number = n1 + number... even though I would not claim that this is a really strong example
of lexically scoped variables, but you probably just simplied a real code example.
And most of my recent code I use lexically scoped type variables
extensively. They are great.
(In principle, one does not need them at the cost of encoding. Using asTypeOf and friends ...)
Merry Xmas, Ralf
Christian Hofer wrote:
Hi,
in order to understand the reason for strange compiler error messages, I often find it convenient to add type signatures to every function. But sometimes this seems to be impossible when using type variables.
I try to give a very easy example:
add :: Num a => a -> a -> a add n1 n2 = addToN1 n2 where addToN1 :: Num a => a -> a addToN1 number = n1 + number
ghc says "Inferred type is less polymorphic than expected", and justly so, because the type variable "a" in addToN1 must of course be the same as in add. Is there a way to specify this?
Regards, Chris
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
