On 18-07-12 17:37, Erik Hesselink wrote:
Hi Martijn,

Yes, upgrading will obviously fix things (we do use 0.14 on our
development machines)
Well, to me it wasn't entirely obvious that upgrading to Cabal-1.10.2.0 fixes the problem for cabal-install-0.12, and I still think this is a good solution for most people that use version 2012.2.0.0 of the platform.

I'd suggest you ask Duncan to patch the hackage repository, and maybe contact the maintainer of HUnit to prevent future problems.

-- Martijn

, but we have not set up any infrastructure for
building a custom cabal on production servers. We just use the one
from the Ubuntu repositories, which uses Cabal 1.10.1.0 on oneiric. So
until we upgrade to precise I guess we have a problem.

Erik

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Martijn Schrage <mart...@oblomov.com> wrote:
Hi Erik,

A similar thing happened to me with the GraphViz package. As Duncan
explained to me, the problem is that Cabal-1.10.0.0 (and I believe also
1.10.1.0) incorrectly reports an error when conditionals are used in test
suites.

Upgrading to Cabal-1.10.2.0 (or cabal-install-0.14.0 with Cabal-1.14.0)
should fix the problem. Unfortunately, this means your build will not work
on a fresh Haskell Platform v2012.2.0.0, until HUnit is patched in the
hackage index.

Cheers,
Martijn Schrage -- Oblomov Systems (http://www.oblomov.com)



On 18-07-12 16:26, Erik Hesselink wrote:
Hi all,

All cabal installs using cabal-install-0.10.2 are currently failing
for us. This is due to the cabal file for HUnit-1.2.5.0, which was
recently uploaded to hackage. The ouput I'm getting from cabal is
just:

Reading available packages...
Resolving dependencies...
cabal: Couldn't read cabal file "HUnit/1.2.5.0/HUnit.cabal"

If I unpack HUnit-1.2.5.0 and call 'cabal configure', I get:

cabal: HUnit.cabal:57: The 'type' field is required for test suites. The
available test types are: exitcode-stdio-1.0

The relevant lines from the cabal file are:

Test-Suite hunit-tests-optimize-0
      Type:               exitcode-stdio-1.0

These look fine to me.

Does anyone have any idea how to go about fixing this (on hackage at
least)? Could this package temporarily be removed, to avoid breaking
everyone's cabal?

Erik

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe





_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to