On 30 April 2013 09:28, Richard A. O'Keefe <o...@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote: > > On 29/04/2013, at 10:04 PM, kudah wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:04:47 +1200 "Richard A. O'Keefe" >> <o...@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote: >> >>> so that there is no possibility of catching errors early; >>> by definition in that processor there are no errors. >> >> Haddock's markup isn't any better in that regard. > > Did I praise Haddock? > >> I spent two hours on >> my first day with haddock figuring out that I needed an empty comment >> line before a code block. It didn't issue any warnings or errors either. > > Report that as a bug. > > For what it's worth, I've resurrected an old design I did and have > been playing with it to see just how bad it really is to use something > like @i<word> than _word_.
Everyone agrees it's useful to have @i<legible> markup :) I'm impressed with Mateusz' balanced summary of the issues and look forward to his GSoC project submission about _Markdown_. Conrad. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
