is that really a problem though? Who's problem are we trying to solve? Is this being proposed to help seasoned haskellers, or make getting started easier for new folks?
those are two VERY different problems. Also many of the maintainers for heavily used packages are incredibly busy as is, do they need to keep track of even *more* email? I'd hope not. In some respects, just having the hackage2 deps and revdeps stats is a good proxy for how likely a package is to be well maintained. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Niklas Hambüchen <m...@nh2.me> wrote: > Well, that's what the "once every 3 months" is good for. > > On Mon 06 May 2013 20:34:13 SGT, Tobias Dammers wrote: > > The problem is that people tend to (truthfully) check such a box, then > > stop maintaining the package for whatever reasons, and never bother > > unchecking the box. > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
