On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:51:06 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote: [..] >Overall, I like the gems approach. The Ruby packages for debian-alikes >are almost invariably out of date and building a lot of these Ruby >enhancements is a pain in the posterior. If I want a stable version of >a given component, I'll use aptitude (or RPM or whatever) and live with >it being out of date. If I want the latest and greatest, however, I'll >stick to the gems. Since gems can be installed and deleted just like >aptitude's packages can be (and just as cleanly) it really isn't that >hard an approach.
Just out of curiousity, does 'gem' work with 'checkinstall'? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://therning.org/magnus
pgpDSzrxZ1XQz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
