A wee bit off topic, but I'm sure it's an acceptable detour.
I just wanted to say that I appreciate both this sort of post and the consistent responses it solicits. I have yet to need my Haskell to perform well, but I'm sure that day will come. I like to follow these questions and hopefully be better prepared for those harsher times :). So thanks for the questions and the answers. On 2/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're right, 'fix' is *not* a fix for non-termination, this is better fixed in the type system (with the right fixed points or you're in a fix) ;) Fixed regards, apfelmus Lennart Augustsson wrote: > This is actually a pretty good algorithm. And also a rather subtle one > when it comes to termination. :) > >> Of course, the best optimization is a better algorithm. In case this is >> what you're after, have a look at >> >> Colin Runciman, Lazy Wheel Sieves and Spirals of Primes >> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/runciman97lazy.html _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
