Andrew Coppin wrote: > apfelmus wrote: >> Andrew Coppin wrote: >> >>> I see lots of *trees*, but no general graphs. (As in, *data* structures >>> having cycles in them. My *code* is often cyclic...) >>> >> >> So what does a compiler do to typecheck it? It represents your code as a >> graph and calculates strongly connected components. >> > > That's quite true - but *I* am not writing a compiler, am I? ;-)
Oh well. You may insist that you won't encounter graphs in your problems and I recommend to delete all symbolic links (aka "aliases") from your file system to that end. Regards, apfelmus _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe