On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Aug 31, 2007, at 16:01 , Sterling Clover wrote: > > > In particular for a function -- n, m, etc or x, y, etc? What about > > for f' defined in a let block of f? If I use x y at the top level I > > need to use another set below -- is that where x' y' are more > > appropriate, or x1, y1? > > Usual style is x',y'.
This seems to be a matter of taste. x1, y1 are certainly ok, too. > For longer names, camelCase is the usual convention but some > libraries which basically import everything from C via the FFI use > C_style_names. Imported constants/macros which are uppercase with _ > tend to be mapped to tHIS_KIND_OF_NAME (see for example the Win32 > package). Is this considered an accident or a feature? I'd prefer to convert these identifiers to thisKindOfName. There is also a collection of articles about style: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Category:Style _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
