Hi > Although I appluad the semantics of the safe package, I'm not delighted > with the idea of replacing our concise elegant standard library names > with uglyAndRatherLongCamelCaseNamesThatCouldBePerlOrEvenJava though. > Conciseness of expression is a virtue.
They aren't that long - merely an extra 4 characters over the standard one to indicate what the specific semantics are. If you can think of better names, then I'm happy to make use of them. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
