On 9/18/07, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although this statement might be a bit heretical on this list, I'll have to > repeat myself again that Cabal, cabal-install, cabal-whatever will *never* be > the right tool for the end user to install Haskell packages on platforms with > their own packaging systems like RPM (the same holds for other systems, I > just use RPM as an example here).
Does RPM, etc., deal with the fact that Haskell library installations are specific to a particular platform? If I install GHC and some library, and later install Hugs or a later GHC, how easy is it to make sure the library is available to the new installations? -- Dave Menendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/> _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
