Jonathan Cast adds 'something' to a discussion about pi.
I commented the statement of Yitzchak Gale, who answered some point
of Dan Piponi:
> A default implementation of pi would only increase usability,
> not decrease it.
I said:
Can you provide some examples of this "increased usability"?
If possible, with a *relevant* context, which shows that PI should belong
by default to the class Floating (whatever we mean by that...)
pi /is/ a method of class Floating. It just doesn't have a default
implementation.
Now, do you have anything to propose, or you just want to criticise
my wording? If I ask why should I be a nice fellow, and you say that I am
a nice fellow, this makes me happy, but doesn't answer my question...
Mind you, we are discussing possible solutions, not just the status quo.
Jerzy Karczmarczuk
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
