> keep in mind that Haskell "composition" (.) > is not really composition in the category-theoretic > sense, because it adds extra laziness. Use this
Do you have a counter-example of (.) not being function composition in the categorical sense? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
