On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:25:18 +0200, Miguel Mitrofanov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - the syntax for an expression
>> - the syntax for a block
> Don't see your point.
The point is the syntax is introduced as transformation of layout form
to
non layout form.
As a user, I just want to be able to spot the basic components of a
source
file without thinking about transformation rules.
Well, most users are.
Are what ?
"Able to spot" or "thinking about ..."
Have you asked them all ?
Is this legal (`plus`) x y ?
Never tried to write this myself, it looks stupid.
What else haven't you tried to write by know ?
It's a kind of mirror, you know .
> then your putStrLn would be performed twice. IO actions are
first-class
> values, that's a feature, not a bug.
What guarantees that by running the main, the string "Hello world" will
be
printed exactly twice ?
What kind of guarantees do you want?
Written in blood.
I just want the sistem to be able to print one of these expressions !
Its this too much to ask ?
Yes, 'cause it means you want to embed almost all source code into the
compiled program.
So ?
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Servers.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
